Hunter Suite
Business Hunter · Acquisition intelligence
Report ID
BH-2026-0725-A04
Engagement
Single target / pre-LOI
Issued
25 July 2026
Validity
60 days
Sample report · Acquisition intelligence

The intelligence layer before due diligence.

Coastal Ridge Coffee Roasters, Ltd — a single-location specialty coffee roaster and retailer trading as Coastal Ridge, in coastal Devon. Independent operator, eleven years trading, listed at £1.15M asking against £305K of seller-stated discretionary earnings.

Composite score
68 / 100
Twelve vectors, weighted
Verdict
HOLD
Conditional — see §06
Target close band
£0.83–0.885M
23–28% below ask
Bowman Methodology™ v3.2 · 12 vectors · 47 signals · 6 data tiers
£1.12M
TTM revenue
£269K
Adjusted SDE
24.0%
SDE margin
4.27×
Implied multiple
68/100
Bowman score
11 yrs
Trading history

Do not sign at the asking price. Reprice to £830K–£885K with a wholesale-retention earn-out.

Key risks: 34% of the wholesale channel — 11.6% of total revenue — in two accounts owned by one hospitality group; £35.8K of overstated discretionary earnings; a lease expiring August 2027; a single certified roaster who is the seller; and no shareholder or data-protection documentation on file.

Section 01 The thesis in one read

Executive summary.

TTM revenue
£1.12M
+11.0% YoY · 3-yr CAGR 11.2%
Adjusted SDE
£269K
−11.7% vs stated £305K
SDE margin
24.0%
vs 18.3% category median
Implied multiple
4.27×
vs 2.8–3.3× comp band

What you are buying

The kind of business private buyers chase and rarely find: a small-batch specialty roaster working from an 1,850 sq ft retail-and-roastery on a tourist-heavy coastal main street. A wholesale book of 23 active accounts, a 1,840-subscriber direct subscription, and brand recognition that survives the seller. Reviews are dense and durable — 4.8 stars across 1,247 Google reviews at a consistent monthly velocity. The product is real, the customers are real, the cash flow is real.

How it scores

Across twelve weighted vectors Coastal Ridge scores 68/100 — a clean hold. Six vectors score 70 or above: brand and review equity, margin quality, lease and premises, growth trajectory, working capital, supply chain resilience. Five sit between 55 and 69: financial documentation, local market defensibility, regulatory and licensing, owner dependency, key-person risk on roasting. One scores 41 — the wholesale customer concentration. The composite is dragged down by fixable issues, not structural rot.

Why the verdict is hold, not buy

Two things break the buy case. First, add-backs are overstated by £35.8K: £14.5K of "consulting" is recurring brand work, £11.2K of vehicle cost is operationally necessary, and £10.1K of "one-time" legal is a three-year runrate. Second, two accounts owned by a single hospitality group represent 34% of the wholesale channel on a handshake pricing deal with no written agreement. Neither is a deal-breaker. Both are deal-repricers.

What to do about it

Do not walk. Reprice and condition. A revised offer of £830K–£885K with a structured earn-out tied to wholesale account retention through month 18 captures the upside while transferring concentration risk back to the seller. Governance and people risk are real but fixable — see §05. The full playbook, with timings, is in §06.

Verdict · conditional

Hold — proceed to negotiation, not to an LOI at ask.
Coastal Ridge is acquirable at the right price. A 23–28% repricing with a wholesale-retention earn-out converts this from a 4.27× decline into a 3.08–3.29× reprice.

This report constitutes acquisition intelligence, not due diligence. It synthesises seller-provided materials, third-party financial extracts, public records, review data and category benchmarks into a decision framework. It is designed to be deployed before a formal accountant-led quality of earnings engagement, not as a substitute for one.

Section 02 Statutory records & filing compliance

Tax returns & Companies House.

Companies House filings in §2.3 to §2.5 are pulled live from the public register at the moment this report is generated — no manual lookup required. Corporation Tax and VAT records in §2.1 and §2.2 are held by HMRC, which publishes no public API for either, so those remain the seller's to evidence directly.

2.1 · Corporation tax returns (CT600) — verify with seller / HMRC

PeriodYear endDeadline FiledStatusProfitCT paid
FY 2023–2431 Mar 202431 Mar 2025 VerifyFiled VerifyVerify
FY 2024–2531 Mar 202531 Mar 2026 VerifyFiled VerifyVerify
FY 2025–2631 Mar 202631 Mar 2027 VerifyPending VerifyVerify

Verify fields are completed from HMRC correspondence and seller-provided CT600 filings — Companies House does not publish CT600 data at all. The FY 2025–26 return is within its filing window and is not overdue.

2.2 · VAT registration & quarterly returns — verify with seller / HMRC

VAT registration number
To verify from seller
VAT scheme
Standard accrual — confirm with seller
MTD compliance
Making Tax Digital — enrolled status to verify
Quarterly returns, FY2024 to FY2026 — 12 quarters
Verify filing dates & net VAT for all twelve
Outstanding VAT liability
Confirm nil balance with HMRC VAT account

2.3 · What we already verified

Live — Companies House public register Everything below is read from the register at run time. It is already done by the time you open the report.
Confirmation statementsPeriod made up to FiledTypeStatus
CS0114 Jun 202518 Jun 2025CS01Filed
CS0114 Jun 202417 Jun 2024CS01Filed
CS0114 Jun 202319 Jun 2023CS01Filed
CS0114 Jun 202220 Jun 2022CS01Filed
CS0114 Jun 202116 Jun 2021CS01Filed
CS0114 Jun 202022 Jun 2020CS01Filed

2.4 · Statutory accounts

AccountsPeriod toFiled TypeStatus
Annual accounts31 Mar 202515 Dec 2025AAFiled
Annual accounts31 Mar 20248 Dec 2024AAFiled
Annual accounts31 Mar 202322 Nov 2023AAFiled
Annual accounts31 Mar 202230 Nov 2022AAFiled
Annual accounts31 Mar 202118 Dec 2021AAFiled
Annual accounts31 Mar 202029 Nov 2020AAFiled

2.5 · PSC, charges & registered office

PSC register
1 on record
Individual PSC — the owner
Charges register
0 outstanding
No debentures or fixed charges filed
Registered office
Confirmed
Coastal Devon — current

The only two steps left

Everything above is already verified. What remains sits entirely outside Companies House. One: HMRC — the seller provides agent access, or printed CT600s for the three years in §2.1. Two: VAT — request the Making Tax Digital submission history for the last twelve quarters from the seller directly.

Section 03 Where the money really is

Quality of earnings.

The seller presents £305K of discretionary earnings on a summary that is not wrong, only incomplete. Below is the same business read through a buyer's lens: every add-back tested against operational necessity, every one-time charge tested against a 36-month window. The result is a defensible £269.2K of adjusted SDE — £35.8K below stated.

3.1 · SDE waterfall — reported to adjusted

£0K £100K £200K £300K £305.0K −£14.5K −£11.2K −£10.1K £269.2K −£35.8K −11.7% Reported SDE Consultingrecurring Vehicle & fueloperational Legalrunrate Adjusted SDE
Three add-backs fail the test. Everything else the seller claimed stands.
LineReportedAdjustment Hunter-adjusted
TTM revenue1,124,000—1,124,000
COGS — green coffee, packaging, freight(427,436)—(427,436)
Gross profit696,564—696,564
Operating expenses, stated(533,864)—(533,864)
Owner compensation add-back+66,300—+66,300
Owner "consulting" — recurring brand work+14,500(14,500)—
Vehicle & fuel — operationally necessary+11,200(11,200)—
Legal "one-time" — three-year average test+10,100(10,100)—
Health insurance — owner only+7,600—+7,600
Depreciation & amortisation+17,700—+17,700
Interest expense+7,000—+7,000
Personal travel — verified non-business+4,900—+4,900
Charitable contributions+3,000—+3,000
Seller-discretionary earnings305,000(35,800)269,200

The £35,800 question

£14,500 · consulting
The owner pays herself for monthly brand and packaging design that continues after close. The buyer either retains her or hires an equivalent. That is a cost, not an add-back.
£11,200 · vehicle and fuel
A 2019 Transit runs daily wholesale deliveries to 23 accounts within 38 miles. Remove the van and you remove the wholesale book.
£10,100 · legal
Stated as one-time, but the 36-month average is £10,100 a year. That is runrate expense, not exceptional spend.

3.2 · Revenue quality — channel mix & concentration

ChannelRevenueMix GMYoYStickiness
Retail café & in-store roastery493,000 43.9%71.2% +5.8%High — location-driven
Wholesale — restaurant & café accounts384,600 34.2%48.2% +14.1%Mixed — see §04
Direct subscription — 1,840 active172,600 15.4%64.8% +22.4%High — 84% 12-month retention
Direct one-off, gifts, classes & events73,800 6.6%65.6% +7.1%Seasonal — partly owner-led
Total TTM1,124,000100% 62.0%+11.0%—

Percentages are rounded and may not sum exactly. Wholesale carries the concentration risk: two restaurants within one hospitality group represent £130,800, which is 34% of the wholesale channel and 11.6% of total revenue, with no signed supply contract since 2021. The most important and most repairable fact in the file.

Section 04 Where it scores, where it bleeds

The twelve vectors.

Each vector is scored 0–100 against category benchmarks drawn from the Hunter Suite reference set of 4,000-plus transactions, including 47 directly comparable specialty-coffee roaster sales. The two marks on each bar are the 50 and 70 thresholds. Weights reflect what moves outcomes in this category, not what is easy to measure.

VectorScoreWt
01Brand & review equity
82
11
02Margin quality
71
11
03Lease & premises
78
8
04Financial documentation
65
8
05Customer concentration
41
9
06Owner dependency
58
8
07Growth trajectory
74
9
08Working capital
80
8
09Regulatory & licensing
69
5
10Supply chain resilience
76
7
11Key-person risk — roasting
55
8
12Local market defensibility
64
8
Bowman composite68 / 100

Weighted mean of the twelve vector scores. Weights sum to 100. The unweighted mean is 67.8.

4.1 · Risk register — the five that move price

R1
Wholesale concentration
34% of the wholesale channel — 11.6% of total revenue — in two accounts owned by one hospitality group. No written supply agreement. Handshake pricing since 2021.
Severity high Likelihood med
Mitigation. Make the LOI contingent on a signed 24-month supply agreement with both accounts. Wholesale-retention earn-out of £59K paid at month 18 if accounts are retained at 90% or more of TTM volume.
R2
Roaster key-person risk
The owner is the sole certified Q-grader and roast profile architect. Two staff are trained on production but not on cupping or new-profile development.
Severity med Likelihood med
Mitigation. Negotiate a 90-day full-time transition plus twelve months part-time consulting at £3.2K a month. Fund Q-grader certification for the lead roaster at roughly £6.3K.
R3
Lease expiry & landlord
The current lease expires August 2027, thirteen months out, with no automatic renewal clause. Coastal main-street rents are up 22% in 36 months.
Severity med Likelihood high
Mitigation. Pre-close, require the seller to negotiate a five-year renewal with a 3% annual cap before the LOI becomes binding.
R4
SDE overstatement
£35,800 of stated add-backs do not survive the operational-necessity test in §03. True adjusted SDE is £269,200.
Severity med Confirmed
Mitigation. Reprice. At 3.0× adjusted SDE this is an £808K business, not £1.15M. Bring the §03 waterfall to negotiation.
R5
Single roaster bottleneck
A 2019 Diedrich IR-12 (12kg) is the only production roaster, operating at roughly 84% capacity. A six-week outage would be catastrophic.
Severity med Likelihood low
Mitigation. Insurable and manageable. Budget £16K for a backup 3kg roaster in the year-one capex plan.

Two further risks — on governance and on the people side of the business — sit outside this financial and operational register and are covered in full in §05.

Section 05 Who runs it, who sells it, who stays

People & structure.

A business is never just its numbers. Below is how Coastal Ridge is actually governed, how it actually wins customers, and who has to show up for any of it to keep working — the parts of due diligence a P&L never shows you.

5.1 · Governance & ownership

Coastal Ridge Coffee Roasters, Ltd is run as a sole owner-operator structure: one director, one shareholder, no board and no independent oversight. That is entirely normal at this scale, but it means every material decision — pricing, hiring, the wholesale relationships, the subscription platform — currently runs through one person, with nothing written down about what happens if she is unavailable.

There is no shareholder or succession agreement on file. That is moot today with a single shareholder, but it becomes relevant the moment a buyer brings in co-investors or a management incentive scheme. The company collects customer data through its subscription platform and email marketing list — 1,840 active subscribers — but its ICO data-protection registration status has not been confirmed. A five-minute check with a real compliance cost if it turns out to be missing.

No related-party transactions were identified. The premises are leased on an arm's-length basis from an unconnected landlord.

5.2 · Marketing & sales engine

Top lead source
~55%
of new business — organic and word of mouth
Recurring revenue
~42%
Subscription plus repeat wholesale
Marketing spend
£380/mo
Instagram and Google, no paid sales team

There is no dedicated sales headcount. The owner and the two production staff hold the wholesale relationships personally, and no CRM or formal pipeline exists — the book of 23 accounts is tracked in a spreadsheet. New customer acquisition leans heavily on local reputation and the 4.8-star, 1,247-review Google profile built up over eleven years, which is a durable asset but not a repeatable, buyer-controlled channel.

The subscription business — 15.4% of revenue at 84% twelve-month retention — is the one genuinely documented, diversified, platform-run revenue stream, and is worth protecting and growing after acquisition. Combined, roughly 42% of revenue sits in de facto recurring channels, but only the subscription portion is contracted at all. The wholesale share of that figure is the same handshake-pricing relationship flagged as R1 in §04.

5.3 · HR & people risk

Headcount is six staff plus the owner: two production and roasting staff — see key-person risk R2 in §04 — three retail and café staff, and one part-time delivery driver who also runs the wholesale round. Turnover has been low: one part-time barista departure in the last twelve months, otherwise a stable team with several people at three years or more.

All staff are on standard written contracts and there are no zero-hours arrangements. A NEST auto-enrolment pension scheme is in place and, on the seller's representation, up to date — confirm this directly with the provider before completion. Payroll is outsourced to a local bookkeeper rather than run in-house, which is a modest positive for continuity. No HR disputes, grievances or tribunal claims, past or ongoing, were disclosed.

5.4 · Governance & people risk register

R6
No shareholder or data-protection documentation
The sole-shareholder structure means no succession or shareholder agreement exists, and ICO/GDPR registration status for the customer data held is unconfirmed.
Severity med Likelihood med
Mitigation. Request written confirmation of ICO registration, or register pre-completion, and put a basic shareholder resolution in place ahead of any co-investment structure.
R7
Undocumented wholesale sales process
No CRM, no written pipeline, and the two largest wholesale relationships — see R1 — exist purely as personal goodwill with the owner.
Severity med Likelihood med
Mitigation. Fund a 90-day CRM handover alongside the owner-transition period already planned for R2. Document account history and pricing before the owner's involvement tapers off.

People risk — the first 100 days

The single biggest people risk in the first hundred days is total decision-making dependency on the outgoing owner, across governance, wholesale sales and roasting. None of it is a deal-killer — all three are addressed by the same structured transition period already priced into R2's mitigation. But it should be written into the LOI as one coordinated handover plan, not three separate asks.

Section 06 What it is actually worth

Valuation & recommendation.

6.1 · Triangulated fair value

MethodValue
SDE multiple — low, 2.8×£753,800
SDE multiple — mid, 3.0×£807,600
SDE multiple — high, 3.3×£888,400
Revenue multiple — 0.78×£876,700
Discounted cash flow — five year, WACC 14.5%£940,200
Weighted fair value£851,000

Weighting: SDE multiple (mid) 60%, revenue multiple 15%, DCF 25%. No asset-floor weighting is applied — net asset value is materially below the going-concern range and is not a meaningful anchor here. The DCF starts from unlevered free cash flow of £116,600: adjusted SDE of £269,200, less £66,300 to replace the owner, less corporation tax at 25% on earnings after depreciation, less £25,000 of maintenance capex and £15,000 of working capital. That base grows at 4% for five years, discounted at a 14.5% WACC, with a terminal value of 3.0× year-five SDE — the same multiple basis as the comparable set, which is 47 specialty-coffee roaster sales 2022–2025 between £0.8M and £2.4M.

6.2 · Where the price should land

At the target close band the deal trades at 3.08–3.29× adjusted SDE, in line with category comparables. Maximum total consideration — the top of the band plus the full earn-out — is £944,000 against a walk-away ceiling of £940,000, so the earn-out must be funded from retained accounts rather than from the ceiling.

16.2%
Year-one cash-on-cash
26.4%
Five-year IRR
3.08–3.29×
SDE multiple at close

Return basis: close at the £857,500 band midpoint, funded with £428,750 of equity plus the £50,000 year-one budget, and £428,750 of bank debt at 11% over seven years. Earnings are taken after replacing the owner at £66,300 and after corporation tax at 25%. The five-year return assumes an exit at 3.0× year-five SDE with the debt balance repaid.

6.3 · Four moves, in order

1

Take the §03 waterfall to the broker first

Week 1

Frame it as the standard quality-of-earnings adjustments any buyer's accountant will surface. That sets the anchor at £808K without making it personal. Decline to sign an LOI at ask.

2

Condition the LOI on four items

Weeks 2–3

A signed 24-month wholesale supply agreement with both hospitality-group accounts. An executed lease renewal through 2032 with a 3% annual cap. A 90-day owner transition covering wholesale, roasting and governance handover. Confirmed ICO registration.

3

Structure the earn-out

Weeks 3–4

£59K payable at month 18 if both anchor wholesale accounts are retained at 90% or more of TTM volume — a 6.9% bump on the midpoint close price, transferring concentration risk back to the seller.

4

Engage QoE and fund year-one capex

Week 5 onward

Retain a regional firm at roughly £14–19K for formal quality of earnings. Budget £50K for year one: £28K working capital, £6.3K Q-grader certification, £16K backup roaster, CRM handover.

The intelligence layer before due diligence. Precision acquisition, at pace.

Hunter Suite Analyst Desk
Notes. This is a sample report demonstrating the Business Hunter output format under the Bowman Methodology™. The company, figures and findings are illustrative. The report format constitutes acquisition intelligence intended to inform pre-LOI negotiation strategy and does not constitute investment, legal, tax or accounting advice. All add-back determinations are buy-side opinions and should be confirmed by a formal quality of earnings engagement before close. Verdict, score and fair-value band are valid for 60 days from issuance.